Government Run Health Care Works

Matthew Yglesias linked to this article saying “Universal health care is working fine in Massachusetts.”

PUNDITS and politicians who oppose universal healthcare for the nation have a new straw man to kick around – the Massachusetts reform plan that covers more than 97 percent of the state’s residents. In the myth that these critics have manufactured, this state’s plan is bleeding taxpayers dry, creating nothing less than a medical Big Dig.

The facts – according to the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation – are quite different. Its report this spring put the cost to the state taxpayer at about $88 million a year, less than four-tenths of 1 percent of the state budget of $27 billion. Yes, the state recently had to cut benefits for legal immigrants, and safety-net hospital Boston Medical Center has sued for higher state aid. But that is because the recession has cut state revenues, not because universal healthcare is a boondoggle. The main reason costs to the state have been well within expectations? More than half of all the previously uninsured got coverage by buying into their employers’ plans, not by opting for one of the state-subsidized plans.

American private health insurance is a boondoggle. I’ve never read a single story about a country deciding it’s government health care should be turned over to the private sector. As for private health insurers making a decision that kill their customers…

-Chris

Advertisements

1 comment so far

  1. jeremydc on

    BTW I’m familiar with the Mass. Taxpayer Foundation through my former job, and they are no pinko lefty group. It’s a business-funded research and advocacy organization whose mission is to represent the state’s corporate establishment. Sometimes I agree with them, sometimes I don’t. In general, businesses in MA have been happy with the health reforms there.

    On a completely separate note, TELL THE GOVERNMENT TO KEEP THEIR GRUBBY HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!!!!


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: